Best Practices For Workers Comp Subrogation And Loss Transfer

Under most state laws, workers can be injured, even killed, while performing the same tasks as other workers. These “occupational diseases” have caused workers compensation bills to skyrocket and companies to close or downsize.

But state laws do not necessarily follow federal OSHA regulations or provide for workers’ compensation benefits. Workers may often be injured during many different work activities – even if the exact work-related activity causing their injury is not specifically listed in state laws subrogation and loss transfer.

People responsible for the loss have an obligation to cooperate with the worker’s claim.

Workers compensation provides coverage for serious injuries sustained while engaged in employment. Although injuries sustained by employees can occur in any workplace, some injuries for subrogation and loss transfer.

Although our findings support an important role for subrogation in preventing wage theft, wage workers may bear a greater financial risk from the relationship than employers, since subrogation compensation is paid in cash and often at a higher cash rate than would be expected if the relationship were contractual or established as a simple social relationship between the employer and worker. 

The risk of receiving subrogation compensation may also be increased if a worker’s rights are not properly protected as a result of subrogation. The Labor Commissioner in Florida, for example, recently estimated that wage theft in the state may total $10 million annually, most of which would be owed to low-income workers.

In fact, a 2015 survey of 2,000 state and local government employees indicated that 44 percent of employees had been injured during their job while performing a required task, regardless of whether they were a designated worker.

Although labor law and tort law differ in some areas, the general trend is for the employer to pay compensation directly to the injured employee. In contrast, many workers compensation programs require the workers in the program to agree to resolve an injury for either the employer or the injured worker. Some programs also provide for a subrogation mechanism to allow the injured worker to receive a share of the benefits. However, all these provisions should be monitored, reviewed, and tailored to the particular circumstance.

1) As far as may be necessary to facilitate the settlement of a worker’s claim, the employer should provide its employees with adequate information concerning the nature of the claim and the opportunity to resolve the matter in a timely manner. The employer should also supply the individual employee with all necessary information that can be used to determine whether the employee is entitled to comp damages, an award of compensatory damages, or a reduction in back pay.

2) If an employer and an individual employee jointly elect to resolve the dispute, a mediator should be engaged to work through the dispute. This process should be initiated only after all sides are confident that they have the necessary information to be able to reach a satisfactory agreement.

3) Employee Subrogation: No wages can be recovered to the employee from a covered employer as a result of a defective work product, bad faith on the part of the covered employer, or intentional conduct by the employer, until the first workday after the covered employee has been informed of the problem and a written acknowledgement of the problem has been furnished to the employee. In no event can an employee be entitled to recovery of wages or benefits in excess of one hundred dollars.


Comments are closed.